20.11.09
Thoreau and MLK, Jr.
Thoreau speaks strongly on his views against the government. His essay was written to the people who feel the same as he does. Thoreau believes that the government is only strong because it is a majority not because it is the most legitimate view point. He states that people don’t always have to follow the law but do what is right instead. Thoreau thinks to much respect for the law leads people to do many unjust things.
In Martin Luther Kings paper “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King, Jr. writes to a group of white clergy men, about the injustices of African-Americans particularly in the south. King writes to change the mind and view points of those who don’t agree with him.
In both papers Thoreau and King call for change. They write about problems dealing with American justices by using facts from slavery and the Mexican War. King and Thoreau also have been to jail for standing up for what they believe in. They build strong ethos and pathos. King compares what he is doing and what should be done to what Biblical figures and God did to appeal to the Christian clergy men. He builds strong pathos by discussing historical events such as the Holocaust and Hitler. Thoreau has creditability from his actions and references to Confucius.
The two are written in different styles though. Thoreau sees the issue one way and believes his way is right, it’s black and white. His argument is very direct and masculine and speaks in a strong tone. And King writes his letter with a more sympathetic letter looking for a common ground and willing to compromise; but at the same time supports his argument strongly. He writes with a rogerian argument, with many acknowledge and responses. He also writes in a sarcastic tone to prove his point. King uses words such as we, you, one for all, let us all hope, brother, to show that he wants to work with the people to find a solution rather than implementing his solution completely. While the two essays were written for different audience, occasions and purposes they both show how powerful putting words together can be.
6.11.09
Thanksgiving
30.10.09
Obama's First Year
27.10.09
"Dear Birth Parents"
23.10.09
JMU Reform
17.10.09
Seasons by the Feelings
Today I don't play as much as I did when I was younger but every time a seasons starts, my first associations to them are sports and those distinct feelings I had growing up playing them. They say we have 11 million senses but we only use 40, I think as a kid we use a lot more, well at least I think I did.
9.10.09
Differences between peronsal narratives and outside the class writings
2.10.09
Language
The amount of a language or the number of languages can vary from person to person, and this can cause a problem with trying to communicate something. “I am a prisoner of my vocabulary.” If you have a thought inside of you but you can not express it thorough language because of your limit to vocabulary, than the idea can not actually exist to others and therefore not knowledgeable. Limits may be with the vocabulary of a particular language or even limits to different kinds of languages. “Thought is born through words—a thought not embodied in words remains a shadow” (Vigotsky). Thoughts must be expressed through a language or part of a language if not the thought can not bee seen clearly or interpreted.
Language can also be understood but misinterpreted by means of different concepts, lost of translation, dialects or accents, slang, multiple meanings, grammar, and sarcasm. If knowledge is being transported or communicated but the meaning is misunderstood than it will not be knowledge because then there will be to beliefs of knowledge on the same subject. For example Voltaire's view that 'Error flies from mouth to mouth, from pen to pen, and to destroy it takes ages.” Knowledge will be destroyed if it is not correctly communicated or understood. In most of the statements heard, spoken, read or written, facts are blended with values. Problems with language and culture also limit language with knowledge. Language may be subjective to biases and values which factual reports may contain. Language also has many roles. Language can create social distinctions, class, ethnicity and gender. Language also is used for preservation of knowledge. Language sustains relationships and authority.
22.9.09
Baldwin and Staple
18.9.09
Ways of Knowing
So how do you know what is true and what is not? There are ways of testing truth and ways of knowing. The ways of knowing are through; sense perception, reason, emotion, and language. Sense perception can be used to test truth by using your senses such as sight, if you see somthing it has to be true, right? Take a look at the picture of the elephant in this link.
(http://lundissimo.info/imgs/puzzles/puzzles.html) How many legs does it have?
Your sense perceptions can decive you at sometimes. Language is an innate attribute and is a main component of transfering knolowdge. It is impossible to think with out knowldge, and you must think in order to determine truth. Reason or logic is used to set principles of truth, and is used to question statments for thier validity and truth. When someone makes a claim to know, it is legitimate to ask for reasons and to expect that these will be coherent. Emotion infleunces our thoughts, behaviour, and steers the pursuit of knowledge. Emotions are key to self-understanding and to understanding the world.
10.9.09
Writing Habits: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
I’ll start with the ugly; I am a procrastinator to the fullest. I tend to wait till the last minute literally late at night, and also right before a writing assignment is due. I have done this for a while now and over time it has developed into a bad habit, one that I hope I can get rid of. Another not so good habit when I do when I write is I don’t put my thoughts down on paper, I try to remember and store them in my head and try recover those thoughts and use them later on in a paper. I have so many thoughts going on through my head about what I’m writing about and I tend think about sentences and thoughts I’m going to use in the last paragraph instead of thinking about the current paragraph I’m on. Another bad habit that goes along with procrastination is while I am writing I take frequent breaks. So after a few sentences I will get up and do something, sometimes it will be a quick break others not so quick. I think this is good and bad for me; instead of writing something that could take me an hour it will take me a day, but also taking breaks refreshes my mind.
Now there are some good writing techniques I use that are unique. I follow the writing process to an extent I just add my own little twist to it. I pre write and plan in my head, I think about what my writing topic and form complete thought out sentences in my head. I also plan out how my paper is going to flow and how the paragraphs are going to be structured. Before I even begin to write something I will have the first paragraph complete stored in my head.
There are some techniques and habits I would like to develop. For example I would like to find away to organize my thoughts and ideas and write them down on paper instead of trying to remember all of them. I would also like to improve on my revising and editing skills, I usually never go back and take a second look at what I have written. Just like any habit it takes time and practice to overcome the bad and develop the good.
2.9.09
The Kitchen
26.8.09
"DNA AGE"
In Harmon's Pulitzer Prize winning articles "The DNA Age" featured in the New York Times, Amy Harmon discusses through series of events in 16 articles dealing with the controversial and ethical issues of DNA testing. Today in our modern society technology has expanded greatly and has allowed us to explore endless possibilities. With almost any question brought up in the scientific world looking to be answered follows a new set of questions dealing with ethics. Ethics within science constrains and sets boundaries that are pushed by questions and testing looking to be done. Harmon brings about in her articles the issue of what is morally right and what are the limits with DNA testing. These articles were addressed to broad range of readers; though everyone may not be interested or aware with DNA testing everyone is affected and related to the topic. These articles were written in a journalistic informative manner and served for many purposes. The articles informed the unaware of DNA testing and current issues that go along with it; and the articles also served for people that were in similar situations as those in the articles and who were looking for answers. Her writings covered various topics that included information on new and advanced technology, issues with the current economy and also covered the medical and scientific aspects dealing with DNA testing.
Examples of moral deliberations with DNA testing Harmon mentions parents that are using preimplantation to get rid of embryos that may carry or pass diseases. This new screening process and future attempt to eradicate Down syndrome has affected people with Down syndrome and has changed the public minds to think that this disease is more of a freakish one rather than just a disability. Harmon mentioned how there is an increase of genetically engineered dogs and how this might be a preview of genetic engineering of humans. Harmon also introduced a woman who had health breasts surgically removed because of genetic predictions of potentially getting cancer. All of these are examples of the ethical dilemmas brought up with DNA testing.
Harmon does a great job making a connection with the reader and keeps them interested and concerned and also leaves her articles open ended and leaves the reader wanting to learn more. She also makes the reader feel sympathetic by introducing personal stories of people who have been affected by this issue. "Then they donned gloves, mixed grout in a large bucket of water and began the job." This statement from one of the articles, Harmon shows how a woman who was diagnosed with Huntington’s is just like any other person and goes on with daily activities and connects with the reader and makes them feel that it could happen to anyone. Harmon’s writing style, technique and interesting topic all lead to the winning of the Pulitzer Prize.
